Q+A: How do I help my colleagues appreciate their communication differences?

A reader asks how they can help build respect between growing tensions on the different communication styles in their workplace.

News and insights to reimagine how we work and thrive.

Happy Friday! This community is growing quickly – we’re at nearly 30,000 subscribers – and I’ve truly haven’t been able to keep up with all the thoughtful questions you send about navigating conflict and challenges in the office.

While on vacation last week I queued up some responses to the most common questions. I really appreciated reading an influx at once, because there are so many similar themes that I may have missed tackling them one at a time. It made me feel even more connected to each of you; we’re working across different industries and in varying capacities (equity consultants, HR and DEI leads, educators, etc) but are all trying to find our way towards more equitable, generative workplaces.

Here’s my response to one that stood out. What would you add? What resources can you offer? Reply to this email and let me know – I’ll share your thoughts next week.

Want to go deeper? Next week is Workshop Week – we’ve got THREE learning experiences on the calendar: Conflict 101, Conflict 201, and Spark Resilience. See you there?

Warmly,

Nicole

A 2D vector-based illustration of three people in conversation, one looking resistant to the dialogue from the others, surrounded by chat bubbles and depicted in rich colors of red, yellow and blue.

"I manage a diverse team where some people are very direct communicators and others are more diplomatic. Lately, the direct folks think the diplomatic ones are being 'fake,' and the diplomatic ones think the direct ones are 'rude.' Everyone means well, but they're driving each other crazy. Help!"

This is actually a beautiful problem to have—it means your team cares enough about each other to be frustrated when communication styles clash, rather than just writing each other off. The tension you're seeing is what happens when good people with different approaches don't understand each other's intentions.

Start by naming the dynamic openly. Help your direct communicators understand that diplomatic colleagues aren't being fake—they're creating space for people to save face and maintain relationships during difficult conversations. Help your diplomatic team members see that direct feedback isn't a personal attack—it's often how their colleagues show they care about the work and trust the relationship enough to be honest.

Create translation opportunities: "When Sarah says 'I wonder if we might consider...' she's actually strongly disagreeing with the approach. When Mike says 'This isn't working,' he's not attacking anyone—he's trying to solve a problem quickly." Teach both styles to stretch toward the middle when the stakes are high.

Lastly, spend some time celebrating these diverse differences in communication and how they can help. You can host a fun, interactive workshop on communication styles and encourage participants to role-play different scenarios, taking different approaches than what they would in a normal workplace scenario. They might learn to appreciate how directness can steer a conversation toward a conclusion, or how diplomacy enables them to approach a conversation with nuanced perspective. Regardless of how they show up, exercises like this can foster more acceptance and understanding of their colleagues and recognize their differences as strengths.

The goal isn't to make everyone communicate the same way, but to help them recognize and appreciate different approaches to the same underlying care.

Conflict Evolution 101

Tuesday, July 22 | 3-5pm EST

This two-hour intensive session focuses on navigating moments of tension and conflict as they arise in professional settings. Participants will learn practical, real-time strategies for de-escalating situations, intervening effectively, and rebuilding trust after moments of rupture.

Through hands-on practice and scenario work, we’ll develop a personalized toolkit for addressing workplace tensions while maintaining cultural awareness and psychological safety.

Conflict Evolution 201

Wednesday, July 23 | 3-6pm EST

Conflict Evolution 201 is designed for practitioners who have completed our foundational workshop and are ready to deepen their practice.

This advanced session provides sophisticated tools, case studies, and extended practice opportunities to develop mastery in conflict transformation in complex professional settings.

Spark Resilience

Thursday, July 24 | 3-6pm EST

Navigating workplace dynamics while facing systemic barriers requires real resilience. This workshop gives you practical tools to maintain your energy, manage stress, and thrive—not just survive—as an underrepresented professional in any industry.

Effective Facilitation

Self-paced, always available

Diversity, equity, and inclusion are essential components of a healthy and productive workplace. In this online, virtual, and self-paced series, we will discuss facilitation techniques for equity and inclusion that can help promote these values by providing participants with practical tools and strategies to create an inclusive and equitable workplace.

We turn workplace disagreements into your company's invitation to foster inclusion and build psychological safety. Instead of just putting out fires, we help your teams see conflict as a powerful tool that strengthens relationships rather than damages them.

A typical engagement includes an assessment of your current conflict patterns, a hands-on workshop with real-world scenarios, and follow-up coaching to make sure these new approaches stick when things get tough.

Book a free, 15-minute consultation to see how we can help.

Learn is the consultancy arm of Reclamation Ventures, an award-winning venture studio that’s created well-known brands like Reimagined, Banned Books Book Club, and the RV Fund. Over the past five years, we’ve helped organizations create more inclusive and equitable spaces through trainings, workshops and hands-on consulting.